Rhetorical Analysis of an "A" Paper
- What are some things that strike you?
Nice visuals that catch your eye, good organization, informative titles, cohesive layout (spacing etc)
- Their own work -4
- Meets word requirement -4
- The citations are not grammatically correct, sources could use more detail within the paper. For example, the citations come after the period when they should come before. "...lacked details such as a timeline and financing. (California Legislative)" -3
- Lacks signal phrases, sentences are choppy and could be smoother. On page two, the student lists about five opinions that seem to kind of stutter along. -2.5
- The student definitely accurately addresses all points of their thesis, and paragraph contents match titles. -4
- As mentioned before, the titles help organize the paper. However, the author seems to drop into the issues straight away without introducing the benefits in a smoother fashion. Also, some bias seems present. -3
- Author has about 6 pages of works cited, definitely meets the minimum requirement. -4
No comments:
Post a Comment